Documents

reasons_why_water_utilities_choose_pvc

Reasons why water utilities choose PVC pipe

Discover why water utilities all around the world choose PVC pipes in fact sheet from Uni-Bell PVC Pipe Association.
Download
PVC-U_Pipe_Competitiveness_A_Total_Cost_of_Ownership_Approach_ALTHESYS

PVC-U Pipe Competitiveness: A Total Cost of Ownership Approach

The Milan-based consultancy Althesys has conducted a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) analysis comparing unplasticised PVC (PVC-U) to other non-plastic materials for water and sewer pipelines lines. The analysis considered the costs to purchase pipes, install, operate and maintain and dismantle the pipeline. PVC-U pipes show significant economic advantages over ductile iron and glass fibre polyester (GRP) in water lines and concrete or clay in the sewer lines.

Download
Total Cost of Ownership: PVC-U vs. other pipe materials

Total Cost of Ownership: PVC-U vs. other pipe materials

Download
teppfa pvc4pipes position paper 100 years service lifetime

100-year lifetime for PVC-U and PVC-Hi pressure pipe systems buried in the ground for water and natural gas supply

Joint position paper by TEPPFA and PVC4Pipes.

Durability is key for underground piping systems, as it is costly to install and replace pipes buried in the ground. TEPPFA and PVC4Pipes have identified the need for explaining the difference between the design point at 20 degree/50 years and the expected life time of PVC-U and PVC-Hi pressure pipe systems.

Research, extrapolation studies and studies of dug-up pipes in service for years show minimal degradation and extrapolative tests performed on these test samples confirm an expected service life in excess of 100 years.

Download
Documents

PVC4Pipes leaflet

Download PVC4Pipes' leaflet and read about our work to communicate about PVC in pipe systems in the global market.
Download
Documents

Repurposing business around the meeting of human needs

Dr. Mark Everard debates how PVC pipes can help meet the sustainable development goals. The article is featured in the scientific journal Environmental Scientist (pp. 40-45).
Download